Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.4103/UA.UA_54_17 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.4103/UA.UA_54_17 C5656964!5656964!29118541     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=29118541&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\29118541.jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Urol+Ann 2017 ; 9 (4): 366-71 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=29118541|t=2017. Hypospadias repair during adulthood: Case series |pdf=|usr=}}{{29118541}} gab.com Text Hypospadias repair during adulthood: Case series JO: Urol Ann http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29118541 #FOAvip Purpose:: We report our complications and success rate in adult hypospadias repair. Patients and Methods:: This was a retrospective study of patients aged ?17 years who underwent hypospadias repair during 2006?2014. We analyzed two groups, one with primary repair and the other that had secondary repair after failed childhood hypospadias surgery. Outcome was compared between the two groups and among different surgical procedures. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test were used and significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results:: Forty patients were included, of which 26 presented for a secondary repair and 14 for primary repair. The meatus was distal in 15 patients, mid-penile in 16, and penoscrotal in 9. The median age of patients at the time of surgery was 21 years (standard deviation [SD] =4, range 17?30). The median follow-up period was 37 months (SD = 8, range 5?75). In the primary repair group, the success rate was 71% (10/14), whereas in the secondary repair group, the success rate was 55% (14/26). The overall complication rate was 60%. Following a subsequent repair, the overall success rate reached 95% (38/40). There was no significant difference in success or complications between patients who presented with primary or secondary hypospadias or between methods of repair. Conclusion:: Delayed hypospadias repair in adults is associated with a high success rate of 95% with no difference between primary and secondary repair. Secondary repair however may require more than one procedure most of the time. Twit Text FOAVip Hypospadias repair during adulthood: Case series ????Urol Ann http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29118541 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29118541 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|29118541}}</ref> Hypospadias repair during adulthood: Case series #MMPMID29118541 AlTaweel WM; Seyam RM Urol Ann 2017[Oct]; 9 (4): 366-71 PMID29118541show ga Purpose:: We report our complications and success rate in adult hypospadias repair. Patients and Methods:: This was a retrospective study of patients aged ?17 years who underwent hypospadias repair during 2006?2014. We analyzed two groups, one with primary repair and the other that had secondary repair after failed childhood hypospadias surgery. Outcome was compared between the two groups and among different surgical procedures. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test were used and significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results:: Forty patients were included, of which 26 presented for a secondary repair and 14 for primary repair. The meatus was distal in 15 patients, mid-penile in 16, and penoscrotal in 9. The median age of patients at the time of surgery was 21 years (standard deviation [SD] =4, range 17?30). The median follow-up period was 37 months (SD = 8, range 5?75). In the primary repair group, the success rate was 71% (10/14), whereas in the secondary repair group, the success rate was 55% (14/26). The overall complication rate was 60%. Following a subsequent repair, the overall success rate reached 95% (38/40). There was no significant difference in success or complications between patients who presented with primary or secondary hypospadias or between methods of repair. Conclusion:: Delayed hypospadias repair in adults is associated with a high success rate of 95% with no difference between primary and secondary repair. Secondary repair however may require more than one procedure most of the time. �Hypospadias repair during adulthood: Case series (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing