Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1073/pnas.1711786114 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1073/pnas.1711786114 C5856513!5856513!29531095     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\29531095.jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Proc+Natl+Acad+Sci+U+S+A 2018 ; 115 (11): 2632-9 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=29531095|t=2018. Scientific progress despite irreproducibility: A seeming paradox |pdf=|usr=}}{{29531095}} gab.com Text Scientific progress despite irreproducibility: A seeming paradox JO: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29531095 #FOAvip It appears paradoxical that science is producing outstanding new results and theories at a rapid rate at the same time that researchers are identifying serious problems in the practice of science that cause many reports to be irreproducible and invalid. Certainly, the practice of science needs to be improved, and scientists are now pursuing this goal. However, in this perspective, we argue that this seeming paradox is not new, has always been part of the way science works, and likely will remain so. We first introduce the paradox. We then review a wide range of challenges that appear to make scientific success difficult. Next, we describe the factors that make science work?in the past, present, and presumably also in the future. We then suggest that remedies for the present practice of science need to be applied selectively so as not to slow progress and illustrate with a few examples. We conclude with arguments that communication of science needs to emphasize not just problems but the enormous successes and benefits that science has brought and is now bringing to all elements of modern society. Twit Text FOAVip Scientific progress despite irreproducibility: A seeming paradox ????Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29531095 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29531095 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|29531095}}</ref> Scientific progress despite irreproducibility: A seeming paradox #MMPMID29531095 Shiffrin RM; Börner K; Stigler SM Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018[Mar]; 115 (11): 2632-9 PMID29531095show ga It appears paradoxical that science is producing outstanding new results and theories at a rapid rate at the same time that researchers are identifying serious problems in the practice of science that cause many reports to be irreproducible and invalid. Certainly, the practice of science needs to be improved, and scientists are now pursuing this goal. However, in this perspective, we argue that this seeming paradox is not new, has always been part of the way science works, and likely will remain so. We first introduce the paradox. We then review a wide range of challenges that appear to make scientific success difficult. Next, we describe the factors that make science work?in the past, present, and presumably also in the future. We then suggest that remedies for the present practice of science need to be applied selectively so as not to slow progress and illustrate with a few examples. We conclude with arguments that communication of science needs to emphasize not just problems but the enormous successes and benefits that science has brought and is now bringing to all elements of modern society. äScientific progress despite irreproducibility: A seeming paradox (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing