Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.ajic.2020.10.013 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.10.013 33091509!7572274!33091509     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\33091509.jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Am+J+Infect+Control 2021 ; 49 (5): 563-570 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33091509|t=2021. Disposable versus reusable medical gowns: A performance comparison |pdf=|usr=}}{{33091509}} gab.com Text Disposable versus reusable medical gowns: A performance comparison JO: Am J Infect Control http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33091509 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: Medical gowns are essential personal protective equipment (PPE) that prevents the spread of microorganisms and bodily fluids. During surge capacity situations, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, reusable PPE is often recommended due to shortages. METHODS: This research evaluated the performance of disposable versus reusable medical gowns by assessing their ability to provide adequate protection across their expected service lifespan. Level I, II, and III gowns were tested for water resistance and hydrostatic pressure, along with other durability assessments (breaking, tear, and seam strength, pilling resistance, dimensional stability, and air permeability, colorfastness, and fabric hand) per standard test methods. Data were collected at new for the disposable gowns and after 1, 25, 50, and 75 industrial launderings for the reusable gowns. Results were compared to the Association of the Advancement Instrumentation(R) (AAMI) PB70 performance specifications. RESULTS: Level I and II disposable gowns did not meet AAMI performance specifications for impact penetration water resistance. All 3 levels of disposable gowns also failed to meet the American Society for Testing and Materials performance requirements for breaking strength in the crosswise direction. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of reusable gowns may result in increased protection and significant cost savings due to their superior durability and sustainability when compared to disposable gowns. Twit Text FOAVip Disposable versus reusable medical gowns: A performance comparison ????Am J Infect Control http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33091509 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33091509 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33091509}}</ref> Disposable versus reusable medical gowns: A performance comparison #MMPMID33091509 McQuerry M; Easter E; Cao A Am J Infect Control 2021[May]; 49 (5): 563-570 PMID33091509show ga BACKGROUND: Medical gowns are essential personal protective equipment (PPE) that prevents the spread of microorganisms and bodily fluids. During surge capacity situations, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, reusable PPE is often recommended due to shortages. METHODS: This research evaluated the performance of disposable versus reusable medical gowns by assessing their ability to provide adequate protection across their expected service lifespan. Level I, II, and III gowns were tested for water resistance and hydrostatic pressure, along with other durability assessments (breaking, tear, and seam strength, pilling resistance, dimensional stability, and air permeability, colorfastness, and fabric hand) per standard test methods. Data were collected at new for the disposable gowns and after 1, 25, 50, and 75 industrial launderings for the reusable gowns. Results were compared to the Association of the Advancement Instrumentation(R) (AAMI) PB70 performance specifications. RESULTS: Level I and II disposable gowns did not meet AAMI performance specifications for impact penetration water resistance. All 3 levels of disposable gowns also failed to meet the American Society for Testing and Materials performance requirements for breaking strength in the crosswise direction. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of reusable gowns may result in increased protection and significant cost savings due to their superior durability and sustainability when compared to disposable gowns. |*Disposable Equipment[MESH] |*Gloves, Protective[MESH] |*Pandemics[MESH] |*Protective Clothing[MESH] |COVID-19/epidemiology/*prevention & control[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]Disposable versus reusable medical gowns: A performance comparison (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing