Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s40656-021-00410-w http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s40656-021-00410-w 33864168!8051544!33864168     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33864168&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\33864168.jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Hist+Philos+Life+Sci 2021 ; 43 (2): 61 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33864168|t=2021. On evidence fiascos and judgments in COVID-19 policy |pdf=|usr=}}{{33864168}} gab.com Text On evidence fiascos and judgments in COVID-19 policy JO: Hist Philos Life Sci http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33864168 #FOAvip Calls for evidence-based approaches to COVID-19 have sparked up discussions on the use of evidence for policy. In this note, we expand these discussions: while the debate has mostly focused on the types of evidence to be used for policy, we argue that the assessment of judgments involved in data practices and evidence production should play a central role in evaluating policy. Twit Text FOAVip On evidence fiascos and judgments in COVID-19 policy ????Hist Philos Life Sci http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33864168 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33864168 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33864168}}</ref> On evidence fiascos and judgments in COVID-19 policy #MMPMID33864168 Jukola S; Canali S Hist Philos Life Sci 2021[Apr]; 43 (2): 61 PMID33864168show ga Calls for evidence-based approaches to COVID-19 have sparked up discussions on the use of evidence for policy. In this note, we expand these discussions: while the debate has mostly focused on the types of evidence to be used for policy, we argue that the assessment of judgments involved in data practices and evidence production should play a central role in evaluating policy. |*Judgment[MESH] |*Policy[MESH] |COVID-19/*prevention & control[MESH] |Communicable Disease Control/*standards[MESH] |Evidence-Based Medicine/*standards[MESH] |Humans[MESH]On evidence fiascos and judgments in COVID-19 policy (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing