Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1111/jar.12915 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1111/jar.12915 34196450!ä!34196450 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\34196450.jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       J+Appl+Res+Intellect+Disabil 2021 ; 34 (6): 1641-1654 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=34196450|t=2021. A quantitative evaluation of a regional Positive Behavioural Support workforce development approach |pdf=|usr=}}{{34196450}} gab.com Text A quantitative evaluation of a regional Positive Behavioural Support workforce development approach JO: J Appl Res Intellect Disabil http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34196450 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: Research suggests that providing staff with input in relation to Positive Behavioural Support (PBS) can have beneficial outcomes. Much of this research, however, fails to take account of systemic issues and does not include a control group. METHOD: We used a non-randomised, controlled group design to evaluate accredited PBS programmes, delivered as part of a systemic, regional and workforce development approach. We compared outcomes of those attending the programmes (n = 240) with a control group (n = 54), pre- and post-intervention and at 3-months follow-up. RESULTS: The programme and its wider impact were rated positively. Significant intervention effects were found for staff practice and retention, but not for staff knowledge and attributions, or behaviours that challenge and quality of life of those being supported. CONCLUSIONS: The results are discussed in the context of the study limitations and restrictions resulting from the Covid-19 pandemic. Twit Text FOAVip A quantitative evaluation of a regional Positive Behavioural Support workforce development approach ????J Appl Res Intellect Disabil http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34196450 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=34196450 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|34196450}}</ref> A quantitative evaluation of a regional Positive Behavioural Support workforce development approach #MMPMID34196450 McKenzie K; Murray G; Martin R; Murray A; Metcalfe D J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2021[Nov]; 34 (6): 1641-1654 PMID34196450show ga BACKGROUND: Research suggests that providing staff with input in relation to Positive Behavioural Support (PBS) can have beneficial outcomes. Much of this research, however, fails to take account of systemic issues and does not include a control group. METHOD: We used a non-randomised, controlled group design to evaluate accredited PBS programmes, delivered as part of a systemic, regional and workforce development approach. We compared outcomes of those attending the programmes (n = 240) with a control group (n = 54), pre- and post-intervention and at 3-months follow-up. RESULTS: The programme and its wider impact were rated positively. Significant intervention effects were found for staff practice and retention, but not for staff knowledge and attributions, or behaviours that challenge and quality of life of those being supported. CONCLUSIONS: The results are discussed in the context of the study limitations and restrictions resulting from the Covid-19 pandemic. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*Intellectual Disability[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Quality of Life[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]A quantitative evaluation of a regional Positive Behavioural Support w(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing