Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1186/s40001-025-02498-3 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1186/s40001-025-02498-3 C11959887!11959887!40170107     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=40170107&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\40170107.jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Eur+J+Med+Res 2025 ; 30 (ä): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=40170107|t=2025. Red blood cell transfusion strategy in traumatic brain injury patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis |pdf=|usr=}}{{40170107}} gab.com Text Red blood cell transfusion strategy in traumatic brain injury patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis JO: Eur J Med Res http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=40170107 #FOAvip Background: The optimal red blood cell transfusion (RBCT) strategy for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients remains a topic of debate. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of a liberal transfusion strategy versus a restrictive strategy in critically ill patients with TBI. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to November 17, 2024. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of critically ill adult patients with TBI, reporting data on RBCT strategies. The outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, long-term mortality, unfavorable functional outcomes, and the incidence of adverse events, such as transfused acute respiratory distress syndrome (TARDS) and venous thromboembolism. We also performed subgroup analyses comparing the association between disease severity and long-term mortality. This review was submitted to PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42024558797). Results: In the results, our analysis revealed that compared to a restrictive transfusion strategy, a liberal strategy did not significantly reduce the risk of ICU mortality (RR: 0.74; 95% CI 0.28?1.91; P?=?0.53) and long-term mortality (RR: 1.02; 95% CI 0.83?1.25; P?=?0.87), but it was able to reduce the risk of unfavorable functional outcomes (RR: 0.90; 95% CI 0.82?0.98; P?=?0.01), although there may be a false positive error. In addition, the liberal transfusion strategy was associated with a higher incidence of Transfused Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (TARDS) (RR: 1.78; 95% CI 1.06?2.98; P?=?0.03). Conclusions: In critically ill patients with TBI, a liberal RBCT strategy appears to improve functional outcomes but carries the risk of false positive errors. In addition, this strategy does not seem to improve survival and may increase the risk of TARDS. Despite this, there remains insufficient evidence to recommend either strategy in this population. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40001-025-02498-3. Twit Text FOAVip Red blood cell transfusion strategy in traumatic brain injury patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis ????Eur J Med Res http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=40170107 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=40170107 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|40170107}}</ref> Red blood cell transfusion strategy in traumatic brain injury patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis #MMPMID40170107 Wang J; Li XH; Yu JQ; Zheng RQ Eur J Med Res 2025[]; 30 (ä): ä PMID40170107show ga Background: The optimal red blood cell transfusion (RBCT) strategy for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients remains a topic of debate. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of a liberal transfusion strategy versus a restrictive strategy in critically ill patients with TBI. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to November 17, 2024. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of critically ill adult patients with TBI, reporting data on RBCT strategies. The outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, long-term mortality, unfavorable functional outcomes, and the incidence of adverse events, such as transfused acute respiratory distress syndrome (TARDS) and venous thromboembolism. We also performed subgroup analyses comparing the association between disease severity and long-term mortality. This review was submitted to PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42024558797). Results: In the results, our analysis revealed that compared to a restrictive transfusion strategy, a liberal strategy did not significantly reduce the risk of ICU mortality (RR: 0.74; 95% CI 0.28?1.91; P?=?0.53) and long-term mortality (RR: 1.02; 95% CI 0.83?1.25; P?=?0.87), but it was able to reduce the risk of unfavorable functional outcomes (RR: 0.90; 95% CI 0.82?0.98; P?=?0.01), although there may be a false positive error. In addition, the liberal transfusion strategy was associated with a higher incidence of Transfused Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (TARDS) (RR: 1.78; 95% CI 1.06?2.98; P?=?0.03). Conclusions: In critically ill patients with TBI, a liberal RBCT strategy appears to improve functional outcomes but carries the risk of false positive errors. In addition, this strategy does not seem to improve survival and may increase the risk of TARDS. Despite this, there remains insufficient evidence to recommend either strategy in this population. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40001-025-02498-3. äRed blood cell transfusion strategy in traumatic brain injury patients(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing