Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.10.008 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.10.008 C4593621!4593621!25554521     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\25554521.jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       J+Clin+Epidemiol 2015 ; 68 (4): 412-7 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=25554521|t=2015. Citation searches are more sensitive than keyword searches to identify studies using specific measurement instruments |pdf=|usr=}}{{25554521}} gab.com Text Citation searches are more sensitive than keyword searches to identify studies using specific measurement instruments JO: J Clin Epidemiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25554521 #FOAvip Objective: To compare the effectiveness of two search methods in identifying studies that used the Control Preferences Scale (CPS), a healthcare decision-making instrument commonly used in clinical settings. Study Design & Setting: We searched the literature using two methods: 1) keyword searching using variations of ?control preferences scale? and 2) cited reference searching using two seminal CPS publications. We searched three bibliographic databases [PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS)] and one full-text database (Google Scholar). We report precision and sensitivity as measures of effectiveness. Results: Keyword searches in bibliographic databases yielded high average precision (90%), but low average sensitivity (16%). PubMed was the most precise, followed closely by Scopus and WOS. The Google Scholar keyword search had low precision (54%) but provided the highest sensitivity (70%). Cited reference searches in all databases yielded moderate sensitivity (45?54%), but precision ranged from 35?75% with Scopus being the most precise. Conclusion: Cited reference searches were more sensitive than keyword searches, making it a more comprehensive strategy to identify all studies that use a particular instrument. Keyword searches provide a quick way of finding some but not all relevant articles. Goals, time and resources should dictate the combination of which methods and databases are used. Twit Text FOAVip Citation searches are more sensitive than keyword searches to identify studies using specific measurement instruments ????J Clin Epidemiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25554521 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25554521 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|25554521}}</ref> Citation searches are more sensitive than keyword searches to identify studies using specific measurement instruments #MMPMID25554521 Linder SK; Kamath GR; Pratt GF; Saraykar SS; Volk RJ J Clin Epidemiol 2015[Apr]; 68 (4): 412-7 PMID25554521show ga Objective: To compare the effectiveness of two search methods in identifying studies that used the Control Preferences Scale (CPS), a healthcare decision-making instrument commonly used in clinical settings. Study Design & Setting: We searched the literature using two methods: 1) keyword searching using variations of ?control preferences scale? and 2) cited reference searching using two seminal CPS publications. We searched three bibliographic databases [PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS)] and one full-text database (Google Scholar). We report precision and sensitivity as measures of effectiveness. Results: Keyword searches in bibliographic databases yielded high average precision (90%), but low average sensitivity (16%). PubMed was the most precise, followed closely by Scopus and WOS. The Google Scholar keyword search had low precision (54%) but provided the highest sensitivity (70%). Cited reference searches in all databases yielded moderate sensitivity (45?54%), but precision ranged from 35?75% with Scopus being the most precise. Conclusion: Cited reference searches were more sensitive than keyword searches, making it a more comprehensive strategy to identify all studies that use a particular instrument. Keyword searches provide a quick way of finding some but not all relevant articles. Goals, time and resources should dictate the combination of which methods and databases are used. äCitation searches are more sensitive than keyword searches to identify(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing